In true Italian fashion, the subject of abolishing
co-ownerships has been talked about for much of this past season, but the decision
was only made about a month ago. When you also consider that the deadline for
resolving them was yesterday, you can see why everyone was too busy to rush out
and make ginormous offers to take our superstar, Matri off of our hands. Don’t
worry, at his bargain price, I’m sure that he will go quickly now that these
tedious co-ownership details are wrapping up.
 |
| All of the fuss about co-ownerships has taken away from all of the transfer interest in our superstar |
Co-ownerships were an anomaly in football almost unique to
Italy. And while kind of complicated, their purpose to encourage the
development of young players perhaps wasn’t being fully realized, so it’s not
surprising that the FIGC chose to abolish them. We talked about this a little bit
on the recent podcast with Steve and the
one before that with the Fantastic Four, but clubs were
allowed to either extend current co-ownerships for one final year or resolve
them by the deadline yesterday, which would have been the normal deadline to
make or extend these kinds of deals anyway. Still, the new ruling left clubs
scrambling to resolve deals that might have otherwise been renewed this week.
 |
| Buying out Gori seems like a good deal, perhaps the future of Milan's goalkeeping? |
Milan had 15 players co-owned with other clubs. They chose
to buy out the contracts of four players: Albertazzi, Gori, Poli, and Saponara.
They renewed the co-ownerships of Comi and Verdi, which will then have to be
resolved by this time next year. They sold the other half of eight players:
Bertoni, Lora, Paloschi, Perucchini, Piscitelli, Salamon, Saporetti, and
Valoti. Additionally, they did not reach an agreement on Pacifico’s
co-ownership, so he will stay at Milan now, but Milan did not receive any compensation from Novara for him. (You can read this
article from last year which includes how co-ownerships work.)
Here is a quick table of all of Milan’s co-owned players,
the clubs they’ve been playing for, which club co-owned them, and the
resolution of the deals:
Besides the obvious great choice to buy out Poli, for me, two deals with Serie A players really stood out. The
first was Saponara, the ownership for whom Milan struggled up until the
deadline day to resolve with Parma, but reportedly ended up buying out his
contract for only €1m. They had previously paid €3.75m plus €.25 in bonuses, so
would need to recoup the €5m they’ve spent just to break even should they decide to sell
him this summer. He could stay at the club now if Kaka does in fact leave, but it is also
possible that he could be loaned or sold.
 |
| Saponara and Poli give the thumbs up to staying at Milan |
The second surprise deal for me was Paloschi. A fan
favorite, and personally given the title of Pippo’s heir by the man himself
before he retired, many fans will regret Milan selling him to Chievo. But the
crime in all of that is the money we didn’t get for him. 18 months ago, when
the co-ownership with Chievo was established, he was valued at €7m, so each
club invested €3.5m in him. Now Milan dumped him for less than they paid,
allowing Chievo to buy him out for only €3m. That wouldn’t be as bad if he had underperformed,
but the kid had 13 goals in Serie A this season for Chievo. I repeat, 13 goals. And we took a loss on him. Incredible.
 |
| Bad enough that we let him go, but we actually lost €.5m on the deal, too |
Compare that to Matri’s single goal for Milan and even throw in
his whopping four Serie A goals for Fiorentina. At a cost of only €11m, Galliani
Maths™ don’t even justify the discrepancy. Especially when Milan had the option
to bring Paloschi back instead of purchasing Matri. But it gets better. Chievo
are only paying the paltry €3m for their double-digit young scorer over three
years’ time. That means Milan will be just paying off the €11m for Matri (purchased
last year on a 4 year payment plan) when we get the last of the €3m from Chievo
for Paloschi. Inconceivable.
The irony of all of this is that Milan’s history of selling
youth players for too cheap came full circle with Matri. Milan entered a
co-ownership for him with Cagliari in 2007 with each club paying €2m. After one
year, Cagliari paid Milan €2m to buy out his contract, so Milan basically broke
even. In a moment of desperation or insanity or both after Pazzini was injured
last year, Milan offered Juventus the infamous €11m for our former youth
player, who after scoring 27 goals for our rival team in two years, gave us the
one goal in half a season and is now the
measurement of incompetence by Milan fans worldwide.
 |
| Who would have guessed back in 1997 this boy would become the €11m man? |
There are many more sad tales of Milan Youth players who
were offloaded on the cheap either on co-ownership deals or straight sales and
then went on to show the world that Milan cannot even scout their own talent and also enjoy throwing money away, too. So maybe the
abolishing of co-ownerships is a good deal, since Milan are clearly incapable
on capitalizing on the concept. However I worry that it will impact the
development of youth in Serie A in general. Without the dual club investment
that simply does not happen on simple loan deals, our future players may never develop properly. But then again, there’s Matri.
A special thank you to @Milanello on Twitter for the current co-ownership facts
and figures
This post inspired by the music of
Sonic Youth